|

Reliability and Maintenance Management
Consultant Idhammar is president of IDCON,
Raleigh, NC, a reliability and maintenance
management consulting firm, specializing in education, training and
implementation of improved operations, reliability,
and maintenance management practices.
Feedback on this reliability
article is appreciated. Send to info@idcon.com
For plant
maintenance consulting information. Please call (919) 847 8764.
More information available in our reliability
and maintenance books |
(Preventive
maintenance 1) (Preventive
maintenance 2)
(Preventive
maintenance 3)
In the first part of this series of columns on Preventive
Maintenance (PM) I talked about the necessity of having a good route
based function in your Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS)
to support easy administration of route based Preventive Maintenance activities.
In this column I will comment on some common reasons, as to why your Preventive
Maintenance program might not always work as well as you would like it
to work.
Wrong content
If your program does not have the right content, it is not generating
the desired results. If your program has not been thoroughly updated in
the last five years, it most probably contains, not only too much Preventive
Maintenance, but also the wrong activities. A good PM program has 90+%
of all PM activities done as inspections while equipment is running and
less than 10% are PM activities that require down time to be done.
Classical examples of wrong and excessive PM, are Preventive Maintenance
activities on V-Belt drives and couplings and many other components with
a safety guards. Many PM programs suggest that these components are inspected
weekly by maintenance crafts people and every shift by operators. On top
of that a shut down PM is also done every six months. The fact is, that
most of the guards are designed in such a way that the components can
not be inspected while equipment is operating, and it does not make sense
to inspect something that can not be seen.
Many guards are big and heavy, so it can take two crafts people several
hours to take off guards, do the inspections and replace the guards during
a shut down. Even worse, if they would find a problem on the component
during this inspection and this problem has to be corrected before start
up, then this could lead to a prolonged shut down.
If guards are designed in the right way, the only PM to be done should
be inspections on the run. In a route based inspection program, each of
these inspections takes an average of about three minutes including walking
time. If a problem is found during these inspections, a planned and scheduled
corrective maintenance action will be done when the next opportunity to
do so presents itself.
To decide on the right content, you must understand three things.
1. The consequence of a break down of the component.
2. How a failure can be detected.
3. How long before a break down of the component a failure can be detected.
Consequence of a break down
A break down is defined as the point in time when a components function
ceases. The consequence of a break down can be prioritized in following
groups.
1. Personal or environmental damage.
2. High costs for production losses or maintenance to correct break down.
3. Preserve value.
As a first step it is a good advise to not go into any elaborate and time
consuming evaluation to find the criticality of equipment. That can be
done later. We use the following fast approach to evaluate criticality:
A. Ask yourself what will happen if this equipment
breaks down?
For 90% of equipment the answer is given by reading the name plate of
equipment and understanding the process. If there is a spare equipment.
How fast can this spare equipment be started etc.
B. Ask Operators If we do not know the answer
to the first question, we will ask an operator. That will take care of
about another 50% of the remaining questions.
C. Consult process and Instrumentation drawings
If the operator does not know the answer it is bad, but it is also identifying
a training opportunity. Together we will look at a process and instrumentation
drawing to learn what will happen if the equipment breaks down. This will
answer most of the remaining of unanswered questions.
With this screening process you only need to analyze what is important
to analyze and you save more than 90% of time as compared to processes
suggested in Reliability Centered Maintenance and similar programs.
Using the same approach as above the next step will be to set up the right
PM for each component (Coupling , valve, cooler etc.) of the equipment.
( E.g. Hydraulic system).
Consider Preventive Maintenance training and implementation support from
IDCON :More
>
|