![]() |
| You are here > Resources > Reliability Tips |
Reliability Tips |
|
|||||||||||||||
![]() |
May 2004 Case study - Results of Condition Monitoring We often get the following two questions: 1. With what condition monitoring technique are failures usually found?
The answer depends on the current equipment condition, the amount of equipment, the type of equipment, and what the consequences of failures are for a plant. There isn't a good answer until some data is taken for a particular plant. But to give you an example, we would like to present the data from a recent project (Case study). Condition Monitoring Technique Used: How failures were found in this particular plant: Visual inspection 46% Cost Savings from Condition Monitoring The calculation would look like this: A: Cost If coupling broke without warning: Downtime * Cost of Downtime/hr + Direct maintenance cost (unplanned & Unscheduled) + Potential damages B: Actual cost of repair: Downtime (if any - should be fixed in scheduled shutdown) * Cost of Downtime/hr + direct maintenance cost (planned & scheduled) + Damages(= 0) A- B = Cost avoidance The cost avoidance calculation was done by operations and maintenance in the daily planning and scheduling meeting. The result was a cost avoidance of $3,100,000 in 7 months. |
|||||||||||||||
| Home | Company | Products | Resources | Bookstore | Events | Articles | Contact Us |