TPM Maintenance Training: I Bet an Operator Can Do This Inspection!
by Torbjörn Idhammar and Michael Lippig
An obvious resource is to use early detection of problems by an operator trained in tpm maintenance. Who can better detect subtle equipment changes? Think about your automobile. Except scheduled maintenance, the automobile operator initiates 98% of shop visits. Most automobile operators also understand that finding problems early equals major savings.
The industry is well aware of the impact of preventive maintenance (regardless if it is performed by an operaor in a tpm maintenance effort or an hourly maintenance person). With downward cost and price pressure and aging equipment, many plants can barely keep fixing what breaks let alone perform simple equipment inspections with overtime-maxed maintenance people. The solution is clear. Break the vicious circle of reactive maintenance.
When recommending the concept of operator inspections in tpm maintenance format, a wall of objections and obstacles arises. Unions may claim this will eliminate work for their maintenance members although operators will be doing nothing more than inspections and what many union agreements already allow.
Another common objection from maintenance people, management personnel, and operators is that operators do not know how to do this. The tpm maintenance tasks operators should perform are simple, common-sense checks. Many operators can do such inspection without training. The fact that many operators maintain their vehicles and home means they are clearly capable of learning and performing complex maintenance tasks.
Many operators are already recording operating parameters such as temperature and pressure. Typically, they file these. Perhaps, a supervisor may examine them another day. This is often mere “busy work.” Teaching the “recorder” to interpret what he sees and then initiate action will provide many valuable front line observers, save uptime, and direct maintenance to the “hotspots” before they turn catastrophic. Marking gauges with the normal operating range and using graphical, eighth-grade level instructions showing the “recorder” why, what, and how to inspect makes the job of an operator more interesting and truly empower him to impact plant performance. I bet an operator can do this!
Most plants have couplings of the “tire” type, see Fig. 2. A simple inspection of a “tire” coupling is to visually inspect it for lose bolts, tears in the tire material, and worn keyways. I bet an operator can do this!
Managers need to decide if operator inspections are the proper action. If so, do not allow attitudes and objections to stand in the way. Forge ahead, make the plans, use pictorial training and reference material, train the operators, and institute the procedures. Examples of training material for operators are available at http://www.idcon.com/store/books/887-cms-combo.html This will definitely be a win-win situation for the operators, maintenance personnel, and the plant. I bet you can do this!